Sources before claims
A record should identify the exact model or variant and its source. Prefer manufacturer documentation and manuals for technical claims; listings help establish the offered product and bundle. Seller claims are not independent proof of performance.
Cross-check important claims where possible. Qualify or omit conflicting or unavailable details rather than guessing. Source links and information-reviewed dates help readers assess the basis of a page.
Research versus testing
Distinguish researched overviews from hands-on tests. Do not imply ownership, measured performance, personal experience or certification without evidence. Inclusion is not a guarantee of quality, suitability or availability.
Benefits, limitations and best-for descriptions should follow from documented features. Show prices, stock or ratings only when a permitted current source supports them. Do not invent reviews, scores, discounts or best-seller status.
AI-assisted production
AI may organise evidence, draft descriptions and scripts, or support editing. An AI-generated statement is not a source; check the resulting claims against product evidence before publication.
Automation must preserve product identity, source references and approved affiliate ownership. Remove or qualify unsupported claims. Generated demonstrations must not be presented as footage of real testing.
Publication and later checks
The intended publication check covers the model, key claims, image/variant match, included items, sources and commercial disclosure. An information-reviewed date describes that editorial check, not live price or stock monitoring.
Weekly editions rotate while product pages remain available. Older information can become outdated. A credible error report should trigger the Corrections Policy.
Questions or concerns?
Contact Product Explorer Hub or check our operator details. The correction link on a product page includes its reference.